Artefacts, mimics & look-alikes

Reverberation, side lobes, attenuation and near-field clutter — and the normal structures that masquerade as thrombus, tumour or dissection.

Numbers to remember

Questions echo must answer

  1. Is this finding real?Two views, consistent motion, plausible anatomy, colour flow behaviour [17].
  2. What produced the artefact?A strong reflector (prosthesis, lead, calcium, catheter), poor window, gain or depth settings.
  3. Is it a normal structure?[176]

Acquisition protocol

  1. Change the window and angleAn artefact moves with the transducer, anatomy does not.
  2. Change depth, focus, gain and harmonics
  3. M-modeShows whether a line moves independently of the walls (dissection flap vs reverberation) [173].
  4. ContrastFills the cavity around a real thrombus and through an artefact.

Diagnosis & severity

ArtefactMechanismTypical place
ReverberationSound bouncing between strong reflectorsBehind prostheses, leads, calcified aorta
Side lobe / beam widthOff-axis echoes placed in the beamNear prosthetic rings, aortic root
Attenuation / shadowingStrong reflector blocks the beamBehind calcium and mechanical valves
Near-field clutterStrong echoes close to the transducerLV apex — "pseudo-thrombus"
Mirror imageStrong specular reflectorDuplicated structures

Thresholds that change management

Pitfalls & mimics